![]() But after a short period of time, you start to fatigue, and after an extended period of time, your arm wants to fall off. ![]() Touch surfaces don’t want to be vertical. We’ve done tons of user testing on this and it turns out it doesn’t work. The interesting thing about the discussion around Lion, led by Jobs in one of the last major Apple product announcements in his lifetime (and also including an early Craig Federighi onstage appearance it was his first full version of Mac OS since returning to the company in 2009), is that the thing that most people remember about the presentation is not the natural scrolling decision, which was somewhat glossed over, but Jobs’ edict that nobody would ever want to use a touchscreen on a laptop: And during the fall 2010 Apple Special Event where Jobs announced the changes, he characterized the shifts in Lion as taking some of the iPad’s best features and applying them to the Mac. The push to offer natural scrolling came about at a time when the iPad was still a relatively new (and fairly groundbreaking) product. To be clear, while the idea of swimming against the tide of what was allowable with scrolling was fairly unusual, at that point, the decisions were easy to frame in the context of what was coming next, rather than what had already happened. When I was 9, I had trouble remembering what side was right and what side was left, but I was able to figure out the differences between scrolling on a trackpad and swiping on a touchscreen right away.īut if Apple was going to make a change like this, 2011 was the year to do it. Some of this might be that I grew up with scroll wheels and trackpads, so I was familiar with the convention well before touchscreens came along. Now, I don’t know about you, but I don’t think about scrolling a trackpad and scrolling a touchscreen in quite the same way. That sounds like a weird distinction, but after the release of touchscreens, this distinction became a really big deal, enough of an issue that Apple felt it was important to design a remedy. If you read any number of posts on websites, you’ll likely hear that the idea behind natural scrolling was that when the scrolling matches the direction of your fingers, you’re manipulating the screen, but when it doesn’t, you’re manipulating the page. You gotta admit, it’s a real Jedi Mind Trick to call this natural scrolling, right?! Some important context around the moment that gave us “natural scrolling” While the embers of 2021 are still emitting light, today’s Tedium looks back at the moment Apple flipped the way we scroll through things on our computers on its head. Apple convinced people that its way of scrolling was “natural.” Now, while I missed the 10th anniversary of this subtle-but-not-so-subtle change by about five months, I still wanted to get my thoughts about it down way before the 15th anniversary. Released with version 10.7 of Mac OS X just over a decade ago, the attempt to reinvent the way our mice and trackpads work felt like an unnecessary flip, but it’s still around a decade later, and most other operating systems now do it as well. When it comes to “natural scrolling,” I fall deeply into the befuddled camp. I wanted to talk about one of those things, a small but confusing shift to the way we use computers, a default that befuddles many, but others don’t mind. ![]() And this is proven when those not-a-given things change unexpectedly out of the blue. UPDATE (10 March): Thanks to a user who figured out the technical work, Update 1.8.2 with a fix is now released.Today in Tedium: Perhaps you don’t think of it this way, but the way that we interact with the objects we own is not necessarily a given. If anyone has any technical info on all this or solutions btw, I am all ears. So I am afraid for now the only course of action is to wait and see if Apple makes any further changes to "un-break" it. That means whatever Scroll Reverser does, it can't reverse the momentum part of the scroll, which is giving the annoying "snap back" effect. It seems Safari is ignoring the direction of the scrolling input during the momentum phase of the scroll, and instead deriving it from some other source. The reason you don't see the problem with the other apps is that they don't attempt to reverse smooth scrolling, only discrete scroll wheels. Unfortunately, Safari on Monterey 12.2 breaks Scroll Reverser's method of reversing smooth scrolling devices - that is, trackpads and the Magic Mouse. However, neither of them can distinguish the Magic Mouse from the Trackpad - that has always been Scroll Reverser's speciality. MOS and UnnaturalScrollWheels are the main alternatives to Scroll Reverser and both are very good apps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |